In Tandem!

Dear Benedict,

My husband and I used to ride a tandem together. Unfortunately I was unable to find a photo of us and want to assure you this was not us!

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA: Not us on a tandem!

However, Chapter 34 of your Rule did remind me of our tandeming days. A tandem is a very just form of transport. Each puts in what they can and receives what they need as a result. Unfortunately our country doesn’t seem to run like a tandem. Too often the one on the front is putting in all the effort whilst the one at the back lays back and enjoys the ride.

‘Each one according to their need’ you write and it’s a good Rule. Only too often we inflate our need because of greed rooted in fear. ‘But what if we couldn’t have that?’ we wonder and as a result we order some more or take something that someone else really needs, or reduce our aid budget or …

One of the things that has been obvious to me during the COVID19 lock down is I don’t really need very much. I may have got used to having a lot and it may be challenging to reduce my consumption, but do I really need all these things? It seems not.

In your Rule you really challenge the grumblers too. Whoa! I’d love to see you on Twitter. Today I learnt what some people thought about a young woman, stripped of British citizenship, who is currently trying to return to the UK from Syria. She left UK after being groomed and radicalised on line when a child. One person wrote ‘I wouldn’t want to be her neighbour’. So I thought of this…

When I was young, being radicalised, were you there, were you there?

When I was young, being radicalised, were you there?

And the creed and the colour and the name won’t matter, were you there?

(Borrowed from Sydney Carter)

You might want to add your own verses: abused, groomed, trafficked, and so on. Where were we for children and young people like these? Where are we now? Living next door?

From the remembered gospel: Jesus said ‘which one was the neighbour??’

Help me live the life of a true neighbour.

From a Friend of St Scholastica and a Member of the Lay Community of St Benedict.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA Not me on the back either, but my daughter wearing my trousers!

Parable of the Three Advisors

Three political advisors obtained government posts.

The first had a record of making racist statements, making comments against disabled people and people from sexual and gender minorities, being misogynistic, promoting pro-eugenic policies and supporting fascist regimes.

When the public heard about him and his record there was an outcry. After a few days he resigned.

Some people said, ‘See public opinion is still strong. He has gone and our society is safe’.

The second advisor tried to suggest a slightly less extreme set of views. He was still promoting social division and encouraging others to voice racist, homophobic, disablist and other discriminatory comments and promoting hate crimes. Some people noted this connection and campaigned for his removal but others said, ‘Freedom of speech is important. He’s not done anything wrong’ and he kept his job.

The third advisor learnt from what had happened to the first two advisors. He said nothing. He supported racist and homophobic attacks and euthanasia for disabled people in secret. He told lies about policies and people, including those who were poor, homeless or living in the margins, but he was clever enough not to attract too much attention. Few people noticed him and he kept his job.

Which of the three advisors posed the most potential danger to your community and the most vulnerable members of it? Listen then if you have ears.

Janet Lees

18.02.2020