Peace

Dear Benedict,

I’ve been interested to read how your Rule first came to Britain. It is thought to have been bought here at the end of the 6th century by Augustine of Canterbury. I find this interesting because some call Augustine’s mission the ‘Christianising’ of England, which is clearly wrong. It might have been a further wave of Christian missionary activity, but it wasn’t the first. In fact the names of the first Christians in Britain are unknown to us, just as you might expect.

Remains of an Anglo-Saxon cross shaft at Nunburnholme, Yorkshire.

So it’s possible that your Rule was bought here by someone else, but Augustine got the credit. It seems that he wanted religious houses in England to use the Rule and it was promoted for men and women to use in monastic communities. I’ve been reading a sample of a book concerning the activities of Benedictine Women during the Middle Ages. Product of a great deal of scholarship I’ve only read the sample but it is fascinating. The author, Katie Bugyis, has looked at many manuscripts from the Middle Ages to support her finding concerning the kind of ministries women were practising during that period.

The remain of St Pancras Church Canterbury, possibly the oldest part of the Augustinian Abbey.

I mention it in relation to chapter 65 of your Rule, another essential read about community leadership. Bugyis suggests that your Rule wasn’t fully adopted by women’s monastic houses in England until the 10th century, and that a feminised version was promoted to make it more applicable to these Abbeys. I’d love to see that.

Her main findings are about the sort of roles women had during this period: reading the Gospels liturgically, hearing confession and offering intercessory prayers are the ones she explores in detail. My heart was joyful: once again we find that women were doing these things and they have been forgotten or covered up or negated in some way. Of course my heart also sinks that power was abused in ways that robbed women of leadership roles then and now. It’s not something I am at peace about.

Statue of St Benedict wrapped up for protection at Stanbrooke Abbey, Wass, Yorkshire in 2016

Chapter 65 refers to the communal need for the ‘preservation of peace and love’ being the foundation of the way in which Abbott or Abbess shall lead the community. Unfortunately, those outside the walls were the ones to determine, too often, what some of those gender based activities might be, and such discrimination is still limiting some interpretations of the ministries of women.

As we approach the season of the Nativity, it’s a time to pray again for a wider understanding of ministry of women. I think of the times when women have ‘given up’ ministries for ‘the peace of the church’. Good thing Mary never gave up pushing for the incarnation.

From the remembered gospel: Jesus said: ‘It’s peace I leave with you, but it’s not like the world’s peace’.

Help me to keep pushing for justice.

From a Friend of Scholastica and a Member of the Lay Community of St Benedict.

#PostingPeace

My friend Doug has written a book about social media. Like The Rule of St Benedict it tackles some of the issues about how we live in our age. Here’s my review

Posting Peace: Why Social Media Divides Us and What We Can Do about It

Posting Peace: Why Social Media Divides Us and What We Can Do about It by Douglas S. Bursch

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Written with passion and energy about Christian engagement with social media and especially about our need to ‘Post Peace’ rather than contribute to the increasingly divisive nature of the world of the internet. It’s a worthy project, both in the US where the book originates and in other parts of the world like the UK, where I live. We can, all too easily, find examples of increasing hostility, hate and division, fed by social media. And some of them we write ourselves.
It is to this that the author, with his experience in things techy has paid attention. He has reflected on the bible and shared his testimony in the hope that we, his readers, will take up his challenge to Post Peace.
The book is full of sound material and each chapter ends with helpful questions for the reader’s reflection as well as two challenges to Post Peace. Although I’ve not yet tried any of them, I have been changed and challenged by the book. Firstly, I am more attentive to the thoughts and feelings that my engagement with social media evokes. I notice what makes me sad, angry, confused or hopeful. I enjoy being part of Mushroom Twitter and have learnt how to recognise many fungi as a result of my engagement with social media. But is that enough?
Here in the UK we also have #BLM and #MeToo. Recent examples of violence against women, particularly the death of #SarahEverard mean I cannot with integrity remove myself from social media use. Doug has helped me to consider how God is calling me to use the space for reconciliation: it’s a work in progress as far as I’m concerned. In this respect I’d have found it more helpful to have chapter 10, on justice and reconciliation, nearer the front of the book.
During the COVID19 pandemic the global connections of social media have enriched my life. I will continue to reflect on the need to Post Peace and enjoy following the author and others, not only people I agree with. If you are also concerned for the polarisations seen on social media and are looking for a nudge towards a greater awareness and practice of reconciliation on line, then I commend this book to you.


@Bambigoesforth

From the remembered bible: Go out joyfully, advance with peace.

Peace be with you

From a Friend of Scholastica and a Member of the Lay Community of St Benedict.